Socio-legal phenomenon: efficiency as a historically determined balance between public and private interests
Abstract
Using specific examples of judicial practice, the article examines the socio-legal phenomenon of the effectiveness of individual legal regulation, which is presented as a certain historically determined socially acceptable balance between public and private interests, and also identifies the issues under study and out-lines ways to resolve the contradiction between the normative definition of the possibilities of individual behavior of the subject of individual regulation and the limits of these possibilities.
The paper shows the need to develop a set of scientifically based theoretical provisions and scientific and practical recommendations to solve the problems of this socio-legal phenomenon at the conceptual level, objectified in normative le-gal acts, standard-setting and law enforcement activities.
About the Authors
M. L. GrantsevaRussian Federation
Grantseva Maria Leonidovna, Postgraduate student
Moscow
V. N. Morozov
Russian Federation
Morozov Vladimir Nikolaevich, Candidate of Law
Moscow
D. I. Mysov
Russian Federation
Mysov Dmitry Ivanovich, lawyer
References
1. Alekseev, S. S. The mechanism of legal regulation in the socialist state [Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v socialisticheskom gosudarstve]. M.: Legal lit., 1966 – 188 p.
2. Aksenova, O.V. Public and private in Roman law: axiological aspect [Publichnoe i chastnoe v rimskom prave: aksiologicheskij aspekt]: dis. ...cand. Jurid. sciences': 12.00.01. Kazan, 2007 – 179 p.
3. Berezina, E. A. Limits of legal regulation of public relations: problems of understanding, classification and significance in the mechanism of legal regulation [Predely pravovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennyh otnoshenij: problemy ponimaniya, klassifikacii i znachenie v mekhanizme pravovogo regulirovaniya] // Current problems of Russian law. 2020 Vol. 15 No. 4 (113). pp. 42-55.
4. Lazarev, V.V. Scope and limits of legal regulation [Sfera i predely pravovogo regulirovaniya] // The Soviet State and law. 1970 No. 11 pp. 38-44.
5. Minnikes I.A. The limits of individual legal regulation-Titles: newaspects of the problem [Predely individual'nogo pravovogo regulirovaniya: novye aspekty problemy] // Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: scientific and practical. Journal. Irkutsk: East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023 No. 2 (105). pp. 9-21.
6. Petrukhin I.L., Baturov G.P., Morshakova T.G. Theoretical foundations of the effectiveness of justice [Teoreticheskie osnovy effektivnosti pravosudiya] . M.: Nauka, 1979 – 390 p.
7. Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 29, 2019 No. 305-ES19-2054 in case No. A40-17615/2018; dated August 19, 2020 No. 310-ES20-11233 in case No. A54-3594/2019; dated March 27, 2023 No. 305-ES23-1965 in case No. A40-248054/2021.
8. The decision of the Arbitration Court: Ural District dated September 1, 2020 No. F09-2887/20 in case No. A60-51414/2019; Moscow District dated November 28, 2022 in case No. A40-248054/2021; Seventeenth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated November 12, 2015 No. 17AP-11877/15; Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated July 06, 2023 No. 09AP-34019/2023 case no. A40-248054/2021.
9. The decision of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow dated May 23, 2022 in case no. A40-248054/2021.
10. Encyclopedia of judicial practice. Withdrawal of a company participant from the company (p. 26 of the Federal Law "On a Limited Liability Company" // SPS GarantPlus. Access mode : https://base.garant.ru/57589719/#text.
Review
For citations:
Grantseva M.L., Morozov V.N., Mysov D.I. Socio-legal phenomenon: efficiency as a historically determined balance between public and private interests. P.O.I.S.K. 2024;(5):97-107. (In Russ.)



