The impact of the digital divide on social health in a post-industrial society
Abstract
The article is devoted to the impact of the phenomenon of digital inequality on social health. It is argued that social health can be considered as the presence of such a system of social ties that ensures the inclusion of a person in society, minimizing factors that undermine physical and mental health. In the context of the transformation of public institutions and social practices associated with the transition to a post-industrial society, an extensive zone of social risks is being formed. By social risks, we mean such a transformation of social reality, such an implementation of certain states of the social system that can lead to the weakening and destruction of the social system or cause any damage to the perceiving subject. In relation to social health, the fundamentally important risks are the crisis of the welfare state and the phenomenon of digital inequality, which in the new conditions becomes a factor either mitigating the consequences of the crisis of traditional social security structures, or one of the forms of structural violence.
About the Authors
V. L. BarkovaRussian Federation
Barkova Valentina Leonidovna, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Head of the Department of Social Work
Moscow
I. M. Loskutova
Russian Federation
Loskutova Irina Mironovna, Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor
Moscow
N. A. Panich
Russian Federation
Panich Natalia Alexandrovna, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor
Moscow
M. V. Sinyaev
Russian Federation
Sinyaev Maxim Viktorovich, Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Durkheim E. Suicide. A sociological etude [Samoubijstvo. Sociologicheskij etyud] / Translated from the French by A. N. Ilyinsky; edited by V. A. Bazarov. — M.: Mysl, 1994. — 400 p.
2. Kolpina L.V. Social health: definition and mechanisms of influence on general health [Social’noe zdorov’e: opredelenie i mekhanizmy vliyaniya na obshchee zdorov’e: obzor literatury]: literature review. Synergy. 2017. № 2
3. Kochetkova L.N. Philosophical discourse on the social state [Filosofskij diskurs o social’nom gosudarstve]. Moscow: Infra-M, 2016. 216 p.
4. Molchanov A.V. Social phenomenology of risk: risk as a social construct [Social’naya fenomenologiya riska: risk kak social’nyj konstrukt. Omskij nauchnyj vestnik]. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2007. № 4
5. Saklakova E.V. Meleshkin V.V. Social risk and social security: attributes of a modern risk society [Social’nyj risk i social’naya bezopasnost’: atributy sovremennogo obshchestva riska]. Canto 2019 No. 2
6. Sidorina T.Y. The welfare state: from utopia to crisis [Gosudarstvo vseobshchego blagosostoyaniya: ot utopii k krizisu]. M., 2013. 356 p.
7. Galtung, Johan. “Violence, Peace and Peace Studies” Journal of Peace Studies, Volume 6, No. 3 (1969), pp. 167-191.
Review
For citations:
Barkova V.L., Loskutova I.M., Panich N.A., Sinyaev M.V. The impact of the digital divide on social health in a post-industrial society. P.O.I.S.K. 2022;(3):70-78. (In Russ.)