Russian cinematography about the family as an instrument to support pro-natalist policy
Abstract
One of the tools that can stimulate an increase in the birth rate is information support of this topic in popular culture. The purpose of the study is to study the content of cinema as part of the information space that can have a beneficial effect on the reproductive attitudes of viewers. The study used content analysis of works of Russian cinema for 1991–2022. The results are as follows: many films correspond to the values of pronatalist politics; cinema conveys the decline in the importance of the reproductive function of the family; the number of works with a negative view of large families is increasing; over the past 15 years, almost 3 times more films and TV series about parenthood have been released; The share of films showing a negative image of motherhood is decreasing. Thus, it is important that cinematography conveys an image of the family that corresponds to the interests of the state.
About the Authors
A. V. Neshataev
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Neshataev Alexander V., assistant
Ekaterinburg
A. S. Zherlygin
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zherlygin Artem S., student
Ekaterinburg
D. S. Kulakov
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kulakov Danil S., student
Ekaterinburg
G. R. Nagoev
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nagoev Georgy R., student
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Zhelnina E. V., Galiullova L. N. Darstellung des Familienlebens in heim1. Zhelnina E. V., Galiullova L. N. Representation of family life in Russian films: results of content analysis [Reprezentaciya semejnoj zhizni v otechestvennyh kinofil'mah: rezul'taty kontent-analiza] // Azimut of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology. 2019. No. 4 (29). pp. 69-76. DOI 10.26140/anip-2019-0804-0017
2. Kosinova M. I., Solgi T. Comparative analysis of family values in Iranian and Russian cinema [Komparativistskij analiz semejnyh cennostej v iranskom i rossijskom kinematografe] // Bulletin of the University. 2022. No. 5. pp. 219-226. DOI 10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-219-226.
3. Laktyukhina E. G., Antonov G. V. "The war of brides": between consumption and experience [«Vojna nevest»: mezhdu potrebleniem i perezhivaniem] // Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Episode 7: Philosophy. Sociology and social technologies. 2015. No. 4 (30). pp. 81-88. DOI 10.15688/jvolsu7.2015.4.10.
4. Saitova D. G., Bagirova A. P. (2021). Using the information resource of the pronatalist policy in the municipalities of the Sverdlovsk region [Ispol'zovanie informacionnogo resursa pronatalistskoj politiki v municipal'nyh obrazovaniyah Sverdlovskoj oblasti] // Municipality: economics and man- agement. No. 3 (36). pp. 69-80. DOI 10.22394/2304-3385-2021-3-69-80.
5. Tyulyunova V. V. The image of the family in modern Russian cinema through the eyes of the audience [Obraz sem'i v sovremennom rossijskom kinematografe glazami zritelej] // The innovative potential of youth: culture, spirituality and morality: Materials of the International Youth Research Conference, Yekaterinburg, December 02-06, 2019. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 2019. pp. 383-387.
6. Fedorova E. D., Yakovleva D. V. The attitude of youth to the image of the family in modern cinema [Otnoshenie molodyozhi k obrazu sem'i v sovremennom kinematografe] // Naukosphere. 2022. No. 9-1. pp. 140-143.
7. Flier A. Ya., Glazkova T. V. The historical evolution of the social functions of the family and the images of their symbolization in culture [Istoricheskaya evolyuciya social'nyh funkcij sem'i i obrazy ih simvolizacii v kul'ture] // Observatory of Culture. 2014. No. 6. pp. 23-29.
Review
For citations:
Neshataev A.V., Zherlygin A.S., Kulakov D.S., Nagoev G.R. Russian cinematography about the family as an instrument to support pro-natalist policy. P.O.I.S.K. 2024;(1):93-101. (In Russ.)
Views:
23
Email this article 