Judicial federalism in the political practice of modern states
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of federal relations in modern states. The experience of the USA and Germany is used as the objects of scientific research.
The author of the article pays close attention to the role and importance of the judiciary in the political history of the United States, as well as the transformation of the Supreme Court of the United States as a key subject of Center-regions relations in this state. The most significant court decisions that influenced the nature of federalism in the United States are considered. The second part of the article examines the experience of the development of the federal system in Germany, from 1949 to the present day. The analysis focuses on identifying the features and characteristics of twentieth-century German federalism. The article also demonstrates the activities of various commissions and groups aimed at modernizing and reforming the federal structure in Germany.
The final part of the article presents a separate case in the form of Bavaria and the specifics of the relationship of this Land with the Federal Center
About the Author
E. E. Kochetkov
Russian University of Transport
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kochetkov Egor Evgenievich, Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Leach, Richard H. «Federalism: A Battery of Questions.» // Publius, vol. 3, no. 2, 1973, pp. 11–47. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3329437. Accessed 30 Jan. 2025;
2. Federalism: A Battery of Question Publius // The journal of Federalism III Fall 1973. P17 [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: www.efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://www.cawater-info.net/library/rus/review_iec.pdf;
3. Fritz W. (2009): Föderalismusreform: Kein Ausweg aus der Politikverflechtungsfalle? Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, No. 64, ISBN 978-3-593-38901-1, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt a. M.;
4. Mayer H. Der kooperative Föderalismus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und die Politikverflechtungsfalle nach Fritz W. Scharp / H. Mayer. - GRIN Verlag, 2007. - 34 p.
5. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/konfessii/mysli-paskal/1_4_3;
6. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/RU/Integration/Grundgesetz/das-grundgesetz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=14 (data obrashcheniya: 29.01.2025);
7. Kireev D.V. «Verhovnyj Sud SSHA protiv Franklina Ruzvel’ta»: K voprosu o sudebnoj reforme v 1930-e gg. [«Verhovnyj Sud SSHA protiv Franklina Ruzvel'ta»: K voprosu o sudebnoj reforme v 1930-e gg.] / D.V. Kireev, E.N. Trikoz // Nravstvenno-pravovye kriterii formirovaniya sudebnoj vlasti v gosudarstve: Sb. statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii / Pod red. V.V. Grebennikova. — M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2018. — S. 73-76.
8. SHtojber Edmund Federalizm i razgranichenie polnomochij v Evrope: tochka zreniya Bavarii [Federalizm i razgranichenie polnomochij v Evrope: tochka zreniya Bavarii]// Sovremennaya Evropa. 2000. №4 (4). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/federalizm-i-razgranichenie-polno-mochiy-v-evrope-tochka-zreniya-bavarii (data obrashcheniya: 29.01.2025).
Review
For citations:
Kochetkov E.E. Judicial federalism in the political practice of modern states. P.O.I.S.K. 2025;(1):47-54. (In Russ.)
Views:
14
Email this article 